Information on Result #481952

There is no (92, 176, 784)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 952690 107355 272745 831488 862378 438567 346215 203228 119867 270233 491532 034110 626429 202785 > 3176

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (92, 177, 784)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction