Information on Result #481991

There is no (59, 177, 254)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 939452 954866 982016 668205 138738 873531 992963 569556 293916 531916 715786 199255 347743 118801 > 3177

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (59, 178, 254)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction