Information on Result #481993

There is no (63, 177, 282)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 937664 880535 540684 887906 411019 254944 191607 039566 929382 244731 775852 480457 986168 478085 > 3177

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (63, 178, 282)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction