Information on Result #482028

There is no (133, 177, 31202)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 821540 312399 700192 195725 855931 486616 592711 597045 322406 561179 133263 536242 684818 378781 > 3177

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (133, 178, 31202)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction