Information on Result #482046
There is no (60, 178, 260)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 9 293681 688662 419373 779212 403983 944971 846021 449652 766452 325613 385484 284720 421944 878705 > 3178
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (60, 179, 260)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |