Information on Result #482074

There is no (116, 178, 3379)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 8 508865 380934 823326 630419 775071 350716 644279 242969 182454 734200 942040 276414 450802 824851 > 3178

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 179, 3379)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction