Information on Result #482081

There is no (130, 178, 16920)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 8 473852 392179 637264 551206 403565 975981 423663 135434 692161 844608 022024 300417 035033 281793 > 3178

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (130, 179, 16920)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction