Information on Result #482081
There is no (130, 178, 16920)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 8 473852 392179 637264 551206 403565 975981 423663 135434 692161 844608 022024 300417 035033 281793 > 3178
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (130, 179, 16920)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |