Information on Result #482101

There is no (61, 179, 266)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 28 729798 365052 703764 893908 168979 587541 188703 333485 853075 088042 963017 685896 309925 750401 > 3179

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (61, 180, 266)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction