Information on Result #482380

There is no (64, 184, 282)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 6896 399011 573766 885080 235203 527131 812819 817510 873667 231396 926316 157550 022344 777784 286041 > 3184

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (64, 185, 282)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction