Information on Result #482380
There is no (64, 184, 282)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 6896 399011 573766 885080 235203 527131 812819 817510 873667 231396 926316 157550 022344 777784 286041 > 3184
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (64, 185, 282)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |