Information on Result #482403
There is no (110, 184, 1693)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 6302 008774 727383 387909 084144 632170 231838 938134 164828 434387 024190 662677 548584 580384 801483 > 3184
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (110, 185, 1693)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |