Information on Result #482438

There is no (65, 185, 288)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 20077 063391 851850 709262 084054 297405 381375 874272 029976 457593 895135 148262 723909 524099 382017 > 3185

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 186, 288)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction