Information on Result #482494
There is no (64, 186, 280)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 62058 617562 558324 550439 166616 749645 988818 835559 908566 077386 358647 993985 974532 816152 071729 > 3186
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (64, 187, 280)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |