Information on Result #482553

There is no (65, 187, 286)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 184668 308290 415647 471079 783218 815561 131166 287257 139761 135080 542735 281964 873882 765419 684581 > 3187

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 188, 286)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction