Information on Result #482668

There is no (65, 189, 284)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 658147 034379 652217 612663 518945 897737 591803 480025 900781 200922 873777 460138 555623 238644 671977 > 3189

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 190, 284)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction