Information on Result #482784

There is no (65, 191, 282)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 14 536994 021704 528654 702440 606550 509493 493973 497196 239879 257631 663510 677051 834290 535869 534681 > 3191

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 192, 282)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction