Information on Result #482843

There is no (66, 192, 288)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 44 301723 955894 233090 669483 358257 932234 573529 660774 264990 376749 853736 427456 686432 367594 171777 > 3192

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (66, 193, 288)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction