Information on Result #482901
There is no (65, 193, 280)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 124 458763 118644 103172 363406 614703 275564 300010 868244 167907 665939 877508 547927 160814 663009 538049 > 3193
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (65, 194, 280)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |