Information on Result #482985

There is no (116, 194, 1781)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 367 777078 264900 044717 165090 732211 908606 830499 624628 211452 136015 647310 004380 198939 189540 981275 > 3194

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 195, 1781)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction