Information on Result #483019

There is no (65, 195, 279)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1264 268860 993259 039608 715225 896928 836949 172393 015770 870525 384254 683502 721144 698708 999901 956527 > 3195

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 196, 279)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction