Information on Result #483068

There is no (163, 195, 2220348)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1093 064042 764791 914487 091325 040354 518905 781781 053414 388904 221698 163021 195970 161990 594196 305537 > 3195

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (163, 196, 2220348)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction