Information on Result #483235

There is no (136, 198, 6895)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 29565 442744 834997 122344 680314 421351 647420 858121 214293 246293 936891 225498 624736 388045 158650 045827 > 3198

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (136, 199, 6895)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction