Information on Result #483262

There is no (67, 199, 289)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 106892 150552 955265 459113 631322 737267 435544 331977 266018 927267 175464 381459 144830 937218 313719 597129 > 3199

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (67, 200, 289)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction