Information on Result #483293

There is no (129, 199, 3555)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 88597 661344 185801 995905 411479 889298 354291 674257 273676 156537 365334 010512 522504 913379 382039 773163 > 3199

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 200, 3555)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction