Information on Result #483338

There is no (96, 200, 642)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 269942 478372 626090 452404 375202 472177 410864 660506 155802 914197 189972 069285 753786 548320 417361 043209 > 3200

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 201, 642)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction