Information on Result #483338
There is no (96, 200, 642)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 269942 478372 626090 452404 375202 472177 410864 660506 155802 914197 189972 069285 753786 548320 417361 043209 > 3200
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (96, 201, 642)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |