Information on Result #483384

There is no (65, 201, 274)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 798420 911025 432646 332315 579993 817685 140448 951597 080586 054491 710090 141367 607357 830989 683305 193385 > 3201

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 202, 274)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction