Information on Result #483384
There is no (65, 201, 274)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 798420 911025 432646 332315 579993 817685 140448 951597 080586 054491 710090 141367 607357 830989 683305 193385 > 3201
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (65, 202, 274)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |