Information on Result #483447
There is no (66, 202, 280)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 700275 458167 344813 781190 951578 995329 127423 622538 268028 721448 858802 355919 682280 645657 701837 638337 > 3202
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (66, 203, 280)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |