Information on Result #483447

There is no (66, 202, 280)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 700275 458167 344813 781190 951578 995329 127423 622538 268028 721448 858802 355919 682280 645657 701837 638337 > 3202

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (66, 203, 280)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction