Information on Result #483479

There is no (130, 202, 3361)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2 415314 389735 290620 176589 712677 110502 074829 897310 942548 307723 397699 262205 846486 167083 697401 386961 > 3202

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (130, 203, 3361)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction