Information on Result #483596
There is no (116, 204, 1364)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 22 128733 829005 916279 186794 063851 988422 611803 601279 834230 271484 068998 133584 327508 205680 839181 532033 > 3204
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (116, 205, 1364)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |