Information on Result #483596

There is no (116, 204, 1364)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 22 128733 829005 916279 186794 063851 988422 611803 601279 834230 271484 068998 133584 327508 205680 839181 532033 > 3204

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 205, 1364)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction