Information on Result #483598

There is no (120, 204, 1674)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 21 656759 632134 521531 715664 702486 674654 039555 376403 297450 178420 944390 079779 871268 971207 518535 115925 > 3204

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (120, 205, 1674)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction