Information on Result #483697

There is no (68, 206, 289)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 194 923645 359953 235602 694963 439704 796209 344867 341817 851808 015356 475384 115984 035474 314289 340445 158963 > 3206

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (68, 207, 289)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction