Information on Result #483848

There is no (116, 208, 1249)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1792 234864 663490 983589 769890 770390 578595 480609 230748 434733 459790 745031 574421 545798 554279 101436 570809 > 3208

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 209, 1249)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction