Information on Result #483921

There is no (135, 209, 3595)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 5270 872534 130929 949880 461857 925020 720322 765506 189914 057268 360848 111687 511776 248813 266104 592015 504143 > 3209

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (135, 210, 3595)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction