Information on Result #483976

There is no (116, 210, 1199)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 16041 949591 678701 562003 693434 948887 295662 197493 615046 423013 027518 170485 590674 571625 256592 884639 915619 > 3210

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 211, 1199)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction