Information on Result #483984

There is no (132, 210, 2817)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 15882 281507 245330 429801 010006 267435 975773 806962 227650 360977 872818 513179 207285 342001 138296 635555 259403 > 3210

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (132, 211, 2817)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction