Information on Result #484017

There is no (69, 211, 292)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 50734 215491 134208 514663 801204 684130 356557 021027 489253 571793 060483 551236 753099 081336 670654 458740 031345 > 3211

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 212, 292)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction