Information on Result #484063

There is no (161, 211, 54114)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 47071 577329 732902 191950 596092 197816 299644 730123 057981 326125 456373 415577 784238 727924 580573 126877 890901 > 3211

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (161, 212, 54114)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction