Information on Result #484064

There is no (163, 211, 76717)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 47054 894616 468424 661111 484265 880956 261464 193056 656960 554545 670216 719959 179508 895004 569420 359951 893281 > 3211

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (163, 212, 76717)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction