Information on Result #484098

There is no (100, 212, 642)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 152248 906162 869703 611068 983058 187513 836205 298672 426646 106401 495170 739021 117311 563675 145595 838823 028785 > 3212

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (100, 213, 642)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction