Information on Result #484106

There is no (116, 212, 1153)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 141768 013975 969661 031822 971245 686919 995891 987068 906454 717956 481062 148201 612615 831632 077801 021151 712705 > 3212

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 213, 1153)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction