Information on Result #484110

There is no (124, 212, 1674)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 141621 744370 706497 660318 312777 155097 819126 857267 084863 590864 777042 305608 250095 183012 522589 878580 541625 > 3212

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (124, 213, 1674)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction