Information on Result #484147
There is no (69, 213, 291)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 489025 080258 460362 888606 991492 440676 195809 328088 831438 032978 918864 390214 243600 422463 090019 858426 260337 > 3213
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (69, 214, 291)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |