Information on Result #484147

There is no (69, 213, 291)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 489025 080258 460362 888606 991492 440676 195809 328088 831438 032978 918864 390214 243600 422463 090019 858426 260337 > 3213

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 214, 291)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction