Information on Result #484157

There is no (89, 213, 463)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 440609 827433 824674 134358 177669 841056 716584 261868 029764 984482 820407 435147 751872 868047 369537 273546 631333 > 3213

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 214, 463)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction