Information on Result #484159

There is no (93, 213, 516)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 430326 666185 493952 932346 847785 858758 976523 639441 684726 065923 862808 942872 229162 373179 623289 845886 475393 > 3213

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (93, 214, 516)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction