Information on Result #484162

There is no (99, 213, 616)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 456575 610835 834139 173118 817556 566874 163991 089102 314987 644792 043012 263469 234352 584175 138617 055867 086161 > 3213

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (99, 214, 616)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction