Information on Result #484177

There is no (129, 213, 2129)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 424949 851964 057090 549629 033559 960251 372479 400255 324117 425899 835626 066554 353772 998800 144141 976894 435657 > 3213

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 214, 2129)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction