Information on Result #484178

There is no (131, 213, 2390)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 425868 922812 903794 565465 103573 668215 858376 190776 835526 591091 503735 019671 142867 880650 904763 235304 690653 > 3213

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (131, 214, 2390)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction