Information on Result #484198

There is no (171, 213, 299783)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 423503 155668 579542 609797 809988 596459 813198 350619 126375 657151 927294 186213 433673 853105 443424 439134 080039 > 3213

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (171, 214, 299783)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction