Information on Result #484237

There is no (116, 214, 1112)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 314636 420909 307937 968065 076404 669511 409408 765343 969145 765375 094401 594141 779922 317727 303893 127410 806193 > 3214

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 215, 1112)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction