Information on Result #484259

There is no (160, 214, 33011)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 270625 875240 751818 009062 764012 783589 509968 605354 568891 128069 731847 427444 575984 676706 926222 014648 041147 > 3214

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (160, 215, 33011)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction