Information on Result #484309

There is no (129, 215, 2010)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3 872701 989153 353939 279562 248011 172398 526921 253228 659267 849093 824268 658626 813630 638695 380327 187175 600353 > 3215

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 216, 2010)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction